![]() Why should I waste space by storing information in RAW files that I do not need? Size – that 15-20% of extra space does make a difference when you have tens of thousands of pictures.Image just to store my post-processing settings. Simplicity – all changes are written into the same file and I do not have to worry about having one separate file per.Compatibility – it doesn’t matter what camera I use today or tomorrow, my files are preserved in one highly-compatible format that is here to stay.Adobe continues to work on the DNG format, enhancing it year after year and adding more functionality and features.Unlike RAW files, the DNG format includes checksum information in the file to detect and prevent file corruption.Adobe provides many ways to automatically convert RAW images to DNG format in such programs as Lightroom.DNG files are capable of storing full original RAW files and these RAW files can be later be manually extracted, if needed.Changes to images can be written directly into DNG files without having to create separate sidecar XMP files to store this data.DNG files are generally smaller than RAW files and can be made even smaller if minimal or no JPEG Preview is stored within the file.No need to be worried about proprietary camera RAW formats – once a RAW file in converted to DNG, it will work with any software that can read the DNG format.Some benefits from DNG vs RAW - Which One is Better and Why Thanks for your reply, understand the point in the darktable’s crew reply.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |